The category of the “adolescent” entered public discourse in the early twentieth century primarily as a problem. Newspaper accounts described the unsettling visibility of urban youth who appeared to elude the main agencies of modern socialisation – school, family, and wage labour – and were often associated with street bands, deviance, and petty crime. After the Second World War, however, the figure of the “teenager” gradually acquired cultural autonomy and, in many narratives, a positive aura. Cinema, popular music, and youth subcultures transformed the street into an initiatory space: a laboratory of identity, a theatre of conflict, and a site in which adolescents could temporarily exit institutional interiors and experiment with autonomy. From the 1980s onwards, this configuration began to change. Mainstream television and the expanding circuits of consumer culture increasingly relocated adolescence to regulated interiors – bedrooms, schools, malls, and other domesticated settings – while late-twentieth-century street-based subcultures persisted only as a residual “long tail”. This process intensified in the early 2000s and radicalised in the 2010s. Contemporary teen dramas depict adolescents less as urban nomads than as subjects enclosed within micro-spaces such as bedrooms, corridors, and platform interfaces. The street largely reappears as a sign of danger, surveillance, or moral downfall, rather than as a space of discovery or freedom. This article conceptualises this transformation as a form of spatial withdrawal within the media imaginary of adolescence and interprets it as the outcome of a long historical genealogy rather than as a sudden decline in sociability. Focusing on teen seriality of the last fifteen years, the analysis traces this shift through three intertwined dimensions: the rise of a pervasive digital mediasphere that virtualises practices once tied to urban movement; the consolidation of informational capitalism, which erodes the boundary between leisure and labour by anticipating expectations of productivity and visibility into youth; and the intensification of social pressures, which displace conflict inward and foreground mental health, identity work, and defensive forms of self-protection. By treating the imaginary as an active symbolic infrastructure, the article shows how transformations of experience become narratively plausible before they are fully legible as sociological facts. In this perspective, the marginalisation of the street signals broader redefinitions of subjectivity, social control, and the conditions of becoming adult.
Escape from the Streets. The Spatial Withdrawal of Adolescents in Teen Dramas of the Last Decade
Alessio Ceccherelli
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
The category of the “adolescent” entered public discourse in the early twentieth century primarily as a problem. Newspaper accounts described the unsettling visibility of urban youth who appeared to elude the main agencies of modern socialisation – school, family, and wage labour – and were often associated with street bands, deviance, and petty crime. After the Second World War, however, the figure of the “teenager” gradually acquired cultural autonomy and, in many narratives, a positive aura. Cinema, popular music, and youth subcultures transformed the street into an initiatory space: a laboratory of identity, a theatre of conflict, and a site in which adolescents could temporarily exit institutional interiors and experiment with autonomy. From the 1980s onwards, this configuration began to change. Mainstream television and the expanding circuits of consumer culture increasingly relocated adolescence to regulated interiors – bedrooms, schools, malls, and other domesticated settings – while late-twentieth-century street-based subcultures persisted only as a residual “long tail”. This process intensified in the early 2000s and radicalised in the 2010s. Contemporary teen dramas depict adolescents less as urban nomads than as subjects enclosed within micro-spaces such as bedrooms, corridors, and platform interfaces. The street largely reappears as a sign of danger, surveillance, or moral downfall, rather than as a space of discovery or freedom. This article conceptualises this transformation as a form of spatial withdrawal within the media imaginary of adolescence and interprets it as the outcome of a long historical genealogy rather than as a sudden decline in sociability. Focusing on teen seriality of the last fifteen years, the analysis traces this shift through three intertwined dimensions: the rise of a pervasive digital mediasphere that virtualises practices once tied to urban movement; the consolidation of informational capitalism, which erodes the boundary between leisure and labour by anticipating expectations of productivity and visibility into youth; and the intensification of social pressures, which displace conflict inward and foreground mental health, identity work, and defensive forms of self-protection. By treating the imaginary as an active symbolic infrastructure, the article shows how transformations of experience become narratively plausible before they are fully legible as sociological facts. In this perspective, the marginalisation of the street signals broader redefinitions of subjectivity, social control, and the conditions of becoming adult.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


