The concept of addiction, traditionally confined to substances such as drugs and alcohol, has expanded to encompass behavioral patterns such as compulsive eating. Emerging evidence suggests that ultra-processed foods (UPFs), particularly those high in refined sugars and saturated fats, may elicit neurobiological responses akin to those observed in substance use disorders. This review explores the hypothesis that food addiction shares common clinical and neurochemical mechanisms with traditional forms of addiction, drawing from DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and recent findings in neuropharmacology. Animal and human studies have demonstrated that excessive consumption of palatable foods can induce behaviors characteristic of addiction—bingeing, craving, tolerance, and withdrawal—accompanied by significant dopaminergic alterations within the mesolimbic reward circuitry. Neuroimaging and molecular studies further reveal that chronic overconsumption of UPFs alters dopaminergic tone, disrupts prefrontal control, and activates stress pathways, thereby reinforcing compulsive intake. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) and its pediatric adaptations provide structured tools for identifying food addiction phenotypes in clinical and research settings. Moreover, parallels between binge eating disorder and substance dependence highlight overlapping neurobehavioral mechanisms. As the obesity epidemic intensifies, particularly among populations with limited access to nutritious foods, understanding the pharmacological underpinnings of food addiction becomes critical. This review underscores the need to reframe UPFs as potentially addictive agents and calls for integrative therapeutic strategies and policy-driven reforms aimed at mitigating their impact on public health.

The addicted brain: How processed foods hijack reward pathways

Friuli, Marzia;
2026-01-01

Abstract

The concept of addiction, traditionally confined to substances such as drugs and alcohol, has expanded to encompass behavioral patterns such as compulsive eating. Emerging evidence suggests that ultra-processed foods (UPFs), particularly those high in refined sugars and saturated fats, may elicit neurobiological responses akin to those observed in substance use disorders. This review explores the hypothesis that food addiction shares common clinical and neurochemical mechanisms with traditional forms of addiction, drawing from DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and recent findings in neuropharmacology. Animal and human studies have demonstrated that excessive consumption of palatable foods can induce behaviors characteristic of addiction—bingeing, craving, tolerance, and withdrawal—accompanied by significant dopaminergic alterations within the mesolimbic reward circuitry. Neuroimaging and molecular studies further reveal that chronic overconsumption of UPFs alters dopaminergic tone, disrupts prefrontal control, and activates stress pathways, thereby reinforcing compulsive intake. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) and its pediatric adaptations provide structured tools for identifying food addiction phenotypes in clinical and research settings. Moreover, parallels between binge eating disorder and substance dependence highlight overlapping neurobehavioral mechanisms. As the obesity epidemic intensifies, particularly among populations with limited access to nutritious foods, understanding the pharmacological underpinnings of food addiction becomes critical. This review underscores the need to reframe UPFs as potentially addictive agents and calls for integrative therapeutic strategies and policy-driven reforms aimed at mitigating their impact on public health.
2026
Dopamine
Food addiction
Mesolimbic reward system
Substance abuse
Sugar addiction
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14085/60924
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact