In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1B as published. During figure assembly, we left in two panels that belonged to the preparatory version of the publication because of a copy-and-paste clerical error. The corrected Figure 1 appears below. In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 4A as published. The first blot of panel A was labelled as p(Thr202/Tyr204)ERK1/2, and the second blot of panel A was labelled as Total ERK1/2 because of a copy-and-paste clerical error. The first blot should be Total ERK1/2 and the second blot should be p(Thr202/Tyr204)ERK1/2, as it was correctly described in the text. The corrected Figure 4 appears below. In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 5C as published. During figure assembly, we left two panels that belonged to the preparatory version of the publication because of a copy-and-paste clerical error. The corrected Figure 5 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Correction to: ABCA1/ABCB1 Ratio Determines Chemo- and Immune-Sensitivity in Human Osteosarcoma (Cells, (2020), 9, 3, (647), 10.3390/cells9030647)
Campani V.;
2025-01-01
Abstract
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1B as published. During figure assembly, we left in two panels that belonged to the preparatory version of the publication because of a copy-and-paste clerical error. The corrected Figure 1 appears below. In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 4A as published. The first blot of panel A was labelled as p(Thr202/Tyr204)ERK1/2, and the second blot of panel A was labelled as Total ERK1/2 because of a copy-and-paste clerical error. The first blot should be Total ERK1/2 and the second blot should be p(Thr202/Tyr204)ERK1/2, as it was correctly described in the text. The corrected Figure 4 appears below. In the original publication, there was a mistake in Figure 5C as published. During figure assembly, we left two panels that belonged to the preparatory version of the publication because of a copy-and-paste clerical error. The corrected Figure 5 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
