The conduct of a company that, although it does not enjoy the status of sponsor of an event, associates its distinctive signs with it in order to obtain an economic advantage by exploiting its media resonance, is considered a source of possible harm to both the event organizer, the relevant sponsors, and, finally, the public. The question is whether the legal system provides for rules, which allow those who consider themselves harmed by such conduct, to take action to obtain compensation for damages
La condotta dell’impresa che, pur non godendo della qualifica di sponsor di un evento, vi associ i propri segni distintivi per ottenere un vantaggio economico sfruttandone la risonanza mediatica, è considerata fonte di possibile pregiudizio tanto per l’organizzatore dell’evento, quanto per i relativi sponsor, quanto, infine, per il pubblico. Si tratta di verificare se l’ordinamento giuridico preveda norme, le quali consentono, ai soggetti che si reputino lesi da tale condotta, di agire per ottenere il risarcimento del danno.
L’insidia dell’ambush marketing negli eventi sportivi
M. Proto
2025-01-01
Abstract
The conduct of a company that, although it does not enjoy the status of sponsor of an event, associates its distinctive signs with it in order to obtain an economic advantage by exploiting its media resonance, is considered a source of possible harm to both the event organizer, the relevant sponsors, and, finally, the public. The question is whether the legal system provides for rules, which allow those who consider themselves harmed by such conduct, to take action to obtain compensation for damagesI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


