Brominated flame retardants (BFRs), including tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and dibromoneopentyl glycol (DBNPG), are present in both saturated and unsaturated polyester resins (UPRs). Given their toxicity, it is imperative to assess the content of this group of chemicals to ensure product safety and environmental sustainability, considering the paucity in the literature of analytical methods to evaluate them, particularly in solid matrices as UPRs. This study aimed to develop a fully automated gas chromatographic analysis of these BFRs, utilizing a flame ionization detector (FID), with prior derivatization of TBBPA and DBNPG with acetic anhydride. A chemometric evaluation was conducted for the derivatization step to enhance the yield of the procedure. The optimized method met the desired requirements for specificity, accuracy, and sensitivity, showing limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ), respectively, of 1.1 µg/mL and 3.3 µg/mL for DBNPG and 3.6 µg/mL and 10.8 µg/mL for TBBPA. Other conventional detectors, i.e., an Electron Capture Detector (ECD) and a Mass Spectrometer (MS), were tested. The ECD showed a higher sensitivity than the FID and MS; however, its linearity proved to be more limited, making it unsuitable for higher concentration scenarios. The MS detector yielded results comparable with those of the FID, yet the latter is a cheaper and more sensitive alternative.

Automated GC-FID Analysis of Brominated Flame Retardants in Polyester Resins with Hydrogen Carrier Gas

Dugheri S.
2025-01-01

Abstract

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs), including tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and dibromoneopentyl glycol (DBNPG), are present in both saturated and unsaturated polyester resins (UPRs). Given their toxicity, it is imperative to assess the content of this group of chemicals to ensure product safety and environmental sustainability, considering the paucity in the literature of analytical methods to evaluate them, particularly in solid matrices as UPRs. This study aimed to develop a fully automated gas chromatographic analysis of these BFRs, utilizing a flame ionization detector (FID), with prior derivatization of TBBPA and DBNPG with acetic anhydride. A chemometric evaluation was conducted for the derivatization step to enhance the yield of the procedure. The optimized method met the desired requirements for specificity, accuracy, and sensitivity, showing limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ), respectively, of 1.1 µg/mL and 3.3 µg/mL for DBNPG and 3.6 µg/mL and 10.8 µg/mL for TBBPA. Other conventional detectors, i.e., an Electron Capture Detector (ECD) and a Mass Spectrometer (MS), were tested. The ECD showed a higher sensitivity than the FID and MS; however, its linearity proved to be more limited, making it unsuitable for higher concentration scenarios. The MS detector yielded results comparable with those of the FID, yet the latter is a cheaper and more sensitive alternative.
2025
automated sample preparation
brominated flame retardants
GC-FID
micro-bore column
unsaturated polyester resins
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14085/41044
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact