Aim: The objective of the study reported here was to assess the orthodontic features in childrenaffected by developmental dyslexia (DD).Patients and methods: A total of 28 children affected by DD (22 boys, six girls; meanage: 9.78 ± 1.69 years) were compared with 51 healthy children (38 boys, 13 girls; mean age 9.41 ± 1.48; range 7–10 years). Reading and writing skills were evaluated along with orthodonticfeatures.Results: The DD and control groups were not significantly different in terms of total intelligence quotient (P = 0.441) and writing skills (P = 0.805 and P = 0.240, respectively), whereassignificant differences were observed between the DD group and control group in both wordreading (2.018 ± 1.714 vs 0.917 ± 0.563; P = 0.000) and non-word reading (2.537 ± 1.543 vs 0.862 ± 0.244; P = 0.000). Moreover, for many orthodontic features, there was no significant difference between the two groups; only in prevalence of diastemas (57.14%, P = 0.006), midlinediastemas (46.42%, P = 0.007), overbite 4 mm (71.42%, P = 0.006) and overjet 4 mm(53.57%, P = 0.001), was there a statistically significant difference. According to univariatelogistic regression analysis, the presence of diastemas (odds ratio [OR] 4.33; 95% confidenceinterval [CI] 1.61–11.65), midline diastemas (OR 4.68; 95% CI 1.61–13.43), an overbite 4 mm(OR 1.75; 95% CI 0.64–4.71), or an overjet 4 mm (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.06–7.20) seems to playa role in the relationship between occlusal abnormalities and DD in children.Conclusion: Children with DD tend to present with altered dental features, particularly in the area of the incisors, suggesting that a persistently different tongue kinematic profile may thusaffect both the developmental variability of the tongue and lip and the occlusion.

Occlusal traits in developmental dyslexia: A preliminary study

LUCCHESE , ALESSANDRA
;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the study reported here was to assess the orthodontic features in childrenaffected by developmental dyslexia (DD).Patients and methods: A total of 28 children affected by DD (22 boys, six girls; meanage: 9.78 ± 1.69 years) were compared with 51 healthy children (38 boys, 13 girls; mean age 9.41 ± 1.48; range 7–10 years). Reading and writing skills were evaluated along with orthodonticfeatures.Results: The DD and control groups were not significantly different in terms of total intelligence quotient (P = 0.441) and writing skills (P = 0.805 and P = 0.240, respectively), whereassignificant differences were observed between the DD group and control group in both wordreading (2.018 ± 1.714 vs 0.917 ± 0.563; P = 0.000) and non-word reading (2.537 ± 1.543 vs 0.862 ± 0.244; P = 0.000). Moreover, for many orthodontic features, there was no significant difference between the two groups; only in prevalence of diastemas (57.14%, P = 0.006), midlinediastemas (46.42%, P = 0.007), overbite 4 mm (71.42%, P = 0.006) and overjet 4 mm(53.57%, P = 0.001), was there a statistically significant difference. According to univariatelogistic regression analysis, the presence of diastemas (odds ratio [OR] 4.33; 95% confidenceinterval [CI] 1.61–11.65), midline diastemas (OR 4.68; 95% CI 1.61–13.43), an overbite 4 mm(OR 1.75; 95% CI 0.64–4.71), or an overjet 4 mm (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.06–7.20) seems to playa role in the relationship between occlusal abnormalities and DD in children.Conclusion: Children with DD tend to present with altered dental features, particularly in the area of the incisors, suggesting that a persistently different tongue kinematic profile may thusaffect both the developmental variability of the tongue and lip and the occlusion.
2013
malocclusion
orthodontic features
learning disorder
Kinematic profile
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14085/37081
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact