The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the transverse dimension and the perimeter of the maxillary arch produced by low friction self-ligating brackets TIME 3 compared to the Invisalign technique. Materials and methods. Both the self-ligating sample and the Invisalign group were composed of 20 subjects, evaluated at the beginning (T0) and at the completion of therapy (T1). All subjects presented a Class I malocclusion with mild crowding in a permanent dentition, without craniofacial anomalies, missing teeth or a history of many patients not wanting to show metal or partially clear orthodontic treatment. Dento-alveolar measurements fixed appliances with arch wires when they smile. Significant differences between the treated groups were assessed with Independent Samples t test (p<0.05). Results. To this date, little clinical research has been published to self-ligating sample and Invisalign group were recorded comprehensively study the effectiveness of Invisalign treatment (1-3). No significant changes were found for CWL, MWF, MWL, and AD values. There was not a statistically significant difference between the treatment durations appliances. These data suggest that Invisalign treatment cannot be somewhat faster than fixed appliances. Moreover the final occlusion might not be as ideal.
Self-ligating versus Invisalign: analysis of dento-alveolar effects
Lagana' GMethodology
;
2011-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the transverse dimension and the perimeter of the maxillary arch produced by low friction self-ligating brackets TIME 3 compared to the Invisalign technique. Materials and methods. Both the self-ligating sample and the Invisalign group were composed of 20 subjects, evaluated at the beginning (T0) and at the completion of therapy (T1). All subjects presented a Class I malocclusion with mild crowding in a permanent dentition, without craniofacial anomalies, missing teeth or a history of many patients not wanting to show metal or partially clear orthodontic treatment. Dento-alveolar measurements fixed appliances with arch wires when they smile. Significant differences between the treated groups were assessed with Independent Samples t test (p<0.05). Results. To this date, little clinical research has been published to self-ligating sample and Invisalign group were recorded comprehensively study the effectiveness of Invisalign treatment (1-3). No significant changes were found for CWL, MWF, MWL, and AD values. There was not a statistically significant difference between the treatment durations appliances. These data suggest that Invisalign treatment cannot be somewhat faster than fixed appliances. Moreover the final occlusion might not be as ideal.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


