Use of information systems1 is, arguably, the most critical variable in the entire repertoire of empirical and behavioral studies pinpointed at the intersection of computing and human beings (Petter et al., 2008; Burton‐Jones and Straub, 2006). It serves as the ultimate goal for numerous key antecedents such as systems design artifacts (e.g., usability, systems/information/service quality, recommender systems, personalization, and auction affordances), cost factors, affective factors (as discussed in Pallud and Elie‐dit‐cosaque, 2008), beliefs (e.g., perceived usefulness, perceived ease‐of‐use), security attitudes (Warkentin et al., 2012), entrepreneurial determinants (del Guidice and Straub, 2011), and generic attitudes/intentions.2 Interestingly, it can itself serve as an important antecedent to outcomes including performance and net benefits (DeLone and McLean, 2003). These effects occur at varying levels of analysis (e.g., individual level, workgroup level, business unit level, firm level, network level, and industry level, as discussed in Burton‐Jones and Gallivan (2007).

USE

DEL GIUDICE M
2012-01-01

Abstract

Use of information systems1 is, arguably, the most critical variable in the entire repertoire of empirical and behavioral studies pinpointed at the intersection of computing and human beings (Petter et al., 2008; Burton‐Jones and Straub, 2006). It serves as the ultimate goal for numerous key antecedents such as systems design artifacts (e.g., usability, systems/information/service quality, recommender systems, personalization, and auction affordances), cost factors, affective factors (as discussed in Pallud and Elie‐dit‐cosaque, 2008), beliefs (e.g., perceived usefulness, perceived ease‐of‐use), security attitudes (Warkentin et al., 2012), entrepreneurial determinants (del Guidice and Straub, 2011), and generic attitudes/intentions.2 Interestingly, it can itself serve as an important antecedent to outcomes including performance and net benefits (DeLone and McLean, 2003). These effects occur at varying levels of analysis (e.g., individual level, workgroup level, business unit level, firm level, network level, and industry level, as discussed in Burton‐Jones and Gallivan (2007).
2012
information systems
Individual Use
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14085/2550
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact