Purpose: This study aimed to create a new quantitative and qualitative Mealtime Assessment Tool (MAT) to be administered by the not institutional caregiver to explore the dysphagic patient's mealtime behavior.Methods: The development and validation process consisted of three steps: firstly, identification of items for the questionnaire, then pilot testing phase of the first version of the instrument and finally a psychometric evaluation in which the test was administered to the target population (adult inpatients with diagnosed and undiagnosed oropharyngeal dysphagia).Results: A factorial analysis explained 51% of the variance and grouped the 12 items of the scale into three categories that defined: a) structural setting and compliance at mealtime, b) behavioral attitude at mealtime, c) structural setting as a function of possible distractibility. The concurrent validity using the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale and Three Oz Water Swallow Test, as the gold standard, was r =0.01. Cronbach's alpha was 0.709. Stability test-retest reliability had ICC values of 0.980 p=0.01. The ROC curve using as state variable the De Pippo test as a dichotomius variable showed the under-curve area as 0.830 (95% CI, 0.763 to 0.897).Conclusions: The validation process led to the conclusion that the MAT is a valid, reliable and stable scale for caregivers.
Development and validation of a new mealtime assessment tool (MAT) for patients with dysphagia. A cross sectional study
Tofani, M;Celletti, C;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to create a new quantitative and qualitative Mealtime Assessment Tool (MAT) to be administered by the not institutional caregiver to explore the dysphagic patient's mealtime behavior.Methods: The development and validation process consisted of three steps: firstly, identification of items for the questionnaire, then pilot testing phase of the first version of the instrument and finally a psychometric evaluation in which the test was administered to the target population (adult inpatients with diagnosed and undiagnosed oropharyngeal dysphagia).Results: A factorial analysis explained 51% of the variance and grouped the 12 items of the scale into three categories that defined: a) structural setting and compliance at mealtime, b) behavioral attitude at mealtime, c) structural setting as a function of possible distractibility. The concurrent validity using the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale and Three Oz Water Swallow Test, as the gold standard, was r =0.01. Cronbach's alpha was 0.709. Stability test-retest reliability had ICC values of 0.980 p=0.01. The ROC curve using as state variable the De Pippo test as a dichotomius variable showed the under-curve area as 0.830 (95% CI, 0.763 to 0.897).Conclusions: The validation process led to the conclusion that the MAT is a valid, reliable and stable scale for caregivers.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.