Purpose: Cryptorchidism associated with gastroschisis has been poorly investigated. We aimed to assess the prevalence of this association, and to address the management and outcome of cryptorchidism in this context. Materials and methods: In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar), without language restrictions from inception to March 31, 2021, for studies on cryptorchidism and gastroschisis co-occurrence. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates of cryptorchidism in gastroschisis and spontaneous testicular descent in this population. Results: Twenty-five studies were included for the systematic review. All were retrospective case reports or series for a total of 175 patients. Pooled prevalence estimate for cryptorchidism in gastroschisis was 19% (95% CI 13–26). Complete data sets for management and outcome analysis were available in 94 patients, involving 120 undescended testes [63 (52.5%) nonpalpable, 34 (28.3%) prolapsed outside the abdominal wall defect, and 23 (19.2%) palpable]. Fifty-five descended spontaneously, with a pooled prevalence estimate of 50% (95% CI 31–69). Twelve testes/remnants were primarily removed or absent, while 49 testes underwent orchiopexy (success rate, 63%). Excluding 4 testes still awaiting orchiopexy, 30 of the remaining 116 (25.8%) testes had a dismal outcome, including testicular loss (19), hypoplasia (8) or recurrent cryptorchidism (3). Conclusion: Cryptorchidism in gastroschisis appears to occur more frequently than in the normal population. The overall mediocre testicular outcome seems to reflect the most unfavorable presentation of cryptorchidism in gastroschisis, which is represented by originally intrabdominal or prolapsed testis in the majority of cases. Level of evidence: IV.
Prevalence, management and outcome of cryptorchidism associated with gastroschisis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Migliara G.;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: Cryptorchidism associated with gastroschisis has been poorly investigated. We aimed to assess the prevalence of this association, and to address the management and outcome of cryptorchidism in this context. Materials and methods: In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar), without language restrictions from inception to March 31, 2021, for studies on cryptorchidism and gastroschisis co-occurrence. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates of cryptorchidism in gastroschisis and spontaneous testicular descent in this population. Results: Twenty-five studies were included for the systematic review. All were retrospective case reports or series for a total of 175 patients. Pooled prevalence estimate for cryptorchidism in gastroschisis was 19% (95% CI 13–26). Complete data sets for management and outcome analysis were available in 94 patients, involving 120 undescended testes [63 (52.5%) nonpalpable, 34 (28.3%) prolapsed outside the abdominal wall defect, and 23 (19.2%) palpable]. Fifty-five descended spontaneously, with a pooled prevalence estimate of 50% (95% CI 31–69). Twelve testes/remnants were primarily removed or absent, while 49 testes underwent orchiopexy (success rate, 63%). Excluding 4 testes still awaiting orchiopexy, 30 of the remaining 116 (25.8%) testes had a dismal outcome, including testicular loss (19), hypoplasia (8) or recurrent cryptorchidism (3). Conclusion: Cryptorchidism in gastroschisis appears to occur more frequently than in the normal population. The overall mediocre testicular outcome seems to reflect the most unfavorable presentation of cryptorchidism in gastroschisis, which is represented by originally intrabdominal or prolapsed testis in the majority of cases. Level of evidence: IV.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.