Introduction: General practitioners are the first prescribers of speech therapy in France, a country in which speech therapists can practice only on medical prescription. The objective of this study was to measure general practioner's knowledge on means of prescribing speech therapy. Method: Cross-sectional study by self-questionnaires for general practitioners and residents in general practice in France. The test assessed five types of knowledge conducive to correct prescription of speech therapy: requirements for prescription, indications, prescription wording, ages of treatment eligibility, and reimbursement. The questionnaires were tested on an expert population, whose median score was used as a cut-off to separate doctors who knew the modalities of speech therapy prescription from those whose knowledge was insufficient. The characteristics differentiating the two groups were compared by multiple logistic regression. Results: Five hundred and three general practitioners and five hundred and two residents in general medicine were included; 82.3% of the physicians having written a thesis and 86.2% of the residents had insufficient knowledge of the modalities of speech therapy prescription. Age, number of years since acquisition of a medical diploma and urban practice all had a negative impact on general practitioners’ knowledge of speech therapy. Conclusion: French general practitioners’ knowledge of speech therapy prescription seems insufficient. It is consequently necessary to improve the initial and continuing training of doctors. Collaborative work between general practitioners and speech therapists should be carried on, developed and strengthened.
General practitioners' knowledge on means of prescribing speech therapy
Solla F.Formal Analysis
;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Introduction: General practitioners are the first prescribers of speech therapy in France, a country in which speech therapists can practice only on medical prescription. The objective of this study was to measure general practioner's knowledge on means of prescribing speech therapy. Method: Cross-sectional study by self-questionnaires for general practitioners and residents in general practice in France. The test assessed five types of knowledge conducive to correct prescription of speech therapy: requirements for prescription, indications, prescription wording, ages of treatment eligibility, and reimbursement. The questionnaires were tested on an expert population, whose median score was used as a cut-off to separate doctors who knew the modalities of speech therapy prescription from those whose knowledge was insufficient. The characteristics differentiating the two groups were compared by multiple logistic regression. Results: Five hundred and three general practitioners and five hundred and two residents in general medicine were included; 82.3% of the physicians having written a thesis and 86.2% of the residents had insufficient knowledge of the modalities of speech therapy prescription. Age, number of years since acquisition of a medical diploma and urban practice all had a negative impact on general practitioners’ knowledge of speech therapy. Conclusion: French general practitioners’ knowledge of speech therapy prescription seems insufficient. It is consequently necessary to improve the initial and continuing training of doctors. Collaborative work between general practitioners and speech therapists should be carried on, developed and strengthened.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.