Background and aim of the work. Triage during the Covid-19 pandemic can impose difficult allocationdecisions when demand for mechanical ventilation or intensive care beds greatly exceeds available resources.Triage criteria should be objective, ethical, transparent, applied equitably and publically disclosed. The aim ofthis review is to describe the triage tools and process for critical care resources in a pandemic health emergency.Methods. A narrative review was conducted of the literature on five electronic databases, namely PubMed,CINHAL, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase, searching for studies published from January 2006 to July2020. Results. The results describe different triage tools. A gold standard of triage does not exist for the adult orpaediatric population. Using probability of short-term survival as the sole allocation principle is problematic. Ingeneral, each triage protocol should be applied with a specific ethical justification, including transparency, dutyto care, duty to steward resources, duty to plan, and distributive justice. Conclusions. Clinical triage decisionsbased on clinical judgment alone are prone to inconsistent application by triage officers in a pandemic. An ethicalframework can inform decision-making and improve accountability. It remains difficult to connect
Triage protocol for allocation of critical health resources during Covid-19 pandemic and public health emergencies. A narrative review
Iacorossi L;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Background and aim of the work. Triage during the Covid-19 pandemic can impose difficult allocationdecisions when demand for mechanical ventilation or intensive care beds greatly exceeds available resources.Triage criteria should be objective, ethical, transparent, applied equitably and publically disclosed. The aim ofthis review is to describe the triage tools and process for critical care resources in a pandemic health emergency.Methods. A narrative review was conducted of the literature on five electronic databases, namely PubMed,CINHAL, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase, searching for studies published from January 2006 to July2020. Results. The results describe different triage tools. A gold standard of triage does not exist for the adult orpaediatric population. Using probability of short-term survival as the sole allocation principle is problematic. Ingeneral, each triage protocol should be applied with a specific ethical justification, including transparency, dutyto care, duty to steward resources, duty to plan, and distributive justice. Conclusions. Clinical triage decisionsbased on clinical judgment alone are prone to inconsistent application by triage officers in a pandemic. An ethicalframework can inform decision-making and improve accountability. It remains difficult to connectI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
